
08 / 2010
05 / 2010
NPM/CNP RESULTS AT 31 MARCH 2010
03 / 2010
Litigation Transcor Astra Group - Petrobras
03 / 2010
NPM/CNP RESULTS AT 31 DECEMBER 2009
11 / 2009
NPM/CNP RESULTS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2009
08 / 2009
NPM/CNP RESULTS AT 30 JUNE 2009
04 / 2009
Arbitrage chamber sets the put option price for the Pasadena Refinery
04 / 2009
THE ARBITRATION PANEL ISSUES A FINAL AWARD REGARDING THE PASADENA REFINERY
03 / 2009
NPM/CNP RESULTS AT 31 MARCH 2009
12 / 2008
11 / 2008
TRANSCOR ASTRA GROUP WILL NO LONGER BE INVOLVED IN THE PASADENA REFINERY
09 / 2008
NPM/CNP RESULTS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2008
09 / 2008
DISCLOSURE OF SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDING AS AT SEPTEMBER 1, 2008
07 / 2008
TRANSCOR ASTRA GROUP EXERCISES ITS PUT OPTION ON THE PASADENA REFINERY
05 / 2008
JOINT VENTURE with EGL in BENELUX
01 / 2008
INVESTMENT IN EUROPEAN GAS LIMITED
02 / 2006
PETROBRAS AND ASTRA AGREE UPON A JOINT VENTURE ON THE PASADENA REFINERY
11 / 2005
PETROBRAS AND ASTRA WILL BE ASSOCIATED IN THE PASADENA REFINERY
08 / 2010
DEVELOPMENT OF THE LITIGATION
DEVELOPMENT OF THE LITIGATION BETWEEN SOME ENTITIES OF THE PETROBRAS AND TRANSCOR ASTRA GROUPS
In March 2010, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Houston Division) issued an order confirming the award issued in April 2009 by an Arbitration Panel ruling on the dispute between certain entities of the PETROBRAS Group and the TRANSCOR ASTRA Group in relation to the Pasadena refinery, and the related trading company. At the time, the court rejected the argument by PETROBRAS that the court did not have jurisdiction to decide this case.
On August 4, 2010, the Federal Court reconsidered its decision and issued an order stating that it did not have jurisdiction to decide the case due to the fact that the principal place of direction and coordination of the TRANSCOR ASTRA GROUP entities involved was in the United States and not outside this country. As a result of its decision that it had no jurisdiction, the district court vacated its earlier decision confirming the award.
The decision on reconsideration did not, however, address the reasoning or earlier conclusion that the award should be confirmed. As a consequence of this ruling, an order confirming the arbitration award on the merits will now have to be pursued in a Texas State Court where TRANSCOR ASTRA GROUP will present the same arguments for confirmation that previously prevailed in the federal court action.
This delay does not alter the opinion of the Group’s management team on the value of the amounts receivable from PETROBRAS and, consequently, should not have any impact on NPM/CNP’s consolidated accounts.